Why is it that the local courts still favor a woman when there is a custody dispute over the children from the failed marriage? Why is it when the father is willing and wants to continue being a part of their children's lives, do the judges still award primary custody to the mother?
In some cases the mothers are not fit, or they are simply very unstable people. They are still awarded primary custody. In cases where the woman wants to move away, (and I'm not talking about needing to move, but simply to move away for her own personal fulfillment) why are these children allowed to be taken away from their fathers?
My friend will be going before family court soon, and will this fate also be awarded to him and his children? His ex-wife wants to move out of the Valley and take the children with her. She currently has a good job here. She wants to give the father only two weekends per month. How would that be beneficial to the children? Currently they spend half of their time with the mother and the other half with the father.