Interest groups, Stossel said, pressure members of Congress into voting for things that have little or no effect on the environment but which increase the influence and fund-raising capabilities of such groups.
Even if greenhouse gases were restricted, Stossel says reliable estimates show restrictions would prevent a rise in global temperature by only a fraction of a degree. He wondered if such low expectations are worth the potential high cost to taxpayers of trillions of dollars and a radically altered lifestyle.
Biotechnology, which is helping to make food more plentiful, is another target of environmentalists. Stossel showed their objections have been answered by the very science they decry.
Bovine growth hormone, for example, increases milk production in cows, though environmentalists regularly condemn it as harmful to human health. Stossel reported that the World Health Organization, the Food and Drug Administration and the American Medical Association have deemed the hormone completely safe.
The most controversial and disturbing moment came when Stossel interviewed elementary schoolchildren in Santa Monica. Stossel told Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly that some individual interviews had been cut by ABC after an environmentalist group contacted and ‘‘brainwashed'' parents into believing that Stossel was doing an ‘‘editorial'' that would be injurious to the environmental cause.
Stossel told O'Reilly he wanted to show how public schoolchildren have been lied to about the environment. He said children believe the one side they have been taught of the global-warming argument: that Republican presidents are responsible for dirty air and water (though, he noted, air and water are much cleaner now) and that corporations are ‘‘evil.''
Even with the interviews that remained in the program, Stossel managed to prove his point. He asked the children what they had learned, and then he quoted governmental and scientific sources to prove the children and their teachers wrong.
He also interviewed activists about their knowledge of the earth, food additives, genetic food engineering and other scientific discoveries designed to improve human life.
‘‘The extremists dominate the debate,'' Stossel told O'Reilly. Indeed they do.
What else have students been taught and what else does the public believe that is factually untrue? It might take years of TV specials and a different education objective to cleanse our systems of the intellectual and moral impurities we have been programmed to accept as truth.
Stossel should be thanked and ABC News praised for allowing another environmental point of view to be heard. The environmental lobby controls almost all of the media, as do so many other liberal perspectives. It is testimony to the power of truth that so many wish to discredit and even silence John Stossel.